What the work actually involves
You are training a foundational model on how audit professionals build and present materials. In practice that means three recurring task types: authoring reference decks from a prompt and a fact pattern (an audit committee update, a findings exhibit summarizing control deficiencies by severity and remediation status, a walkthrough slide for a revenue cycle), grading model output against a rubric that covers factual accuracy, professional convention, and slide craft, and rewriting weak output into the version you would have actually put in front of a client's audit committee.
The judgment being captured is the part that is hard to write down. Why a significant deficiency and a material weakness cannot be shown in the same column. Why a management letter point is phrased in the passive. Why an engagement status slide leads with scope changes rather than hours burned. Expect to explain your edits in writing — the reasoning is often worth more to the lab than the corrected deck itself.
What the screen looks for
- Verifiable firm and tenure detail: which practice, which industries, which engagements you presented on
- Whether you have personally built and defended audit committee materials, not just contributed schedules to someone else's deck
- Real PowerPoint depth — layouts, masters, exhibit design under a partner's review cycle
- Written precision under follow-up, since most of the deliverable is prose reasoning attached to slides
The first stage is an AI voice screen. It asks short factual questions and then probes whatever you said. Vague seniority claims collapse quickly at that second layer.
Logistics
Fully remote and asynchronous. Tasks are claimed from a queue with deadlines usually measured in days, not hours, so this sits alongside a full-time role for most contributors. Flexible commitment of 5–20 hours per week, more if you want it. Pay of $80/hour reflects observed rates on this project and is not guaranteed for every task type or contributor.