Federal Grants Management Specialist

$60–85/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Generalist

Review, draft, and evaluate federal grants materials used to train and assess AI systems. The work spans NOFOs, application scoring, award monitoring, compliance analysis, and 2 CFR Part 200.

What the work involves

This remote contractor role applies federal grants management experience to AI training and evaluation. Day-to-day assignments may include drafting federal funding announcements and Notices of Funding Opportunity (NOFOs), scoring applications and budget justifications, preparing monitoring findings, and developing realistic scenarios across pre-award, award, and post-award processes.

What the platform screens for

The screening is likely to test whether you can explain specific grants work under follow-up, not simply identify regulations. Expect to discuss how you apply 2 CFR Part 200, distinguish eligibility review from merit review, document compliance deficiencies with supporting evidence, and assess AI-generated outputs for regulatory and procedural accuracy. Prior AI training, model evaluation, or content review experience is a plus rather than a stated requirement.

Practical details

The engagement is remote and structured as contractor work. The listing does not specify whether assignments are asynchronous, the expected weekly commitment, or typical working hours, so candidates should confirm scheduling and availability expectations with micro1.

Pay band: $60–85/hr

What they look for

Customer Service
Teamwork
Attention to Detail
GS-1109
Grant Management

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your experience covers identifiable lifecycle responsibilities rather than general program administration or grant writing.
A strong answer: Organize the answer by lifecycle stage and name the documents, decisions, systems, and stakeholders you handled at each stage. Clarify whether you held decision authority, performed analysis, or supported another grants official.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose credibility by describing only applicant-side proposal writing while implying responsibility for federal award administration.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.