What the work involves
You receive clinical case material describing adolescent substance use and write a structured assessment: what the pattern suggests, how severe it is, how urgently someone needs to act, and what level of care fits. You will stage severity against DSM-5 SUD criteria and map placement against ASAM dimensions, then judge whether a proposed intervention (sometimes a model-generated one) is safe and clinically appropriate, including pharmacological options such as MOUD and withdrawal management in under-18s. A recurring task is drawing the line between developmentally expected experimentation and a clinically significant pattern, and saying plainly why you drew it there. Cases that carry withdrawal, overdose, or safeguarding risk need to be flagged for escalation rather than quietly scored.
What the platform screens for
micro1 runs an AI-led interview before any task work. Expect it to test whether your adolescent caseload is recent and real: tool fluency (CRAFFT, S2BI, DSM-5, ASAM), what you actually do when a 16-year-old screens positive for daily cannabis plus intermittent opioid use, how you handle confidentiality against parental notification, and where the evidence base for adolescent MOUD is thin. Follow-up questions go a layer deeper than the first answer, so cite thresholds, criteria counts, and guideline sources rather than describing your general approach. Written English at research standard matters here, because the deliverable is prose that a non-specialist has to act on.
Logistics
- Remote, contractor, asynchronous task work with no fixed shifts
- Pay band: $45–95/hr, as observed for this listing, not guaranteed
- Roles typically fill within 48 hours; first tasks expected within 24 to 48 hours of onboarding
- Your assessments are benchmarked against peer input and published best practice, so consistency across cases is tracked
No AI background is required. The value you bring is the clinical judgment, and the discipline to write it down in a form that can be audited.
