Legal Expert, Mandarin Chinese (mainland China) - AI Training

$85/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~21 hrs/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Legal

Experienced lawyers will create realistic mainland China legal tasks, prompts, files and grading rubrics for training AI agents. The role requires at least five years of practice, native or fluent Mandarin Chinese, specified PRC qualifications and availability for about 21 hours per week.

The work

You will turn legal work as practised in mainland China into structured AI training exercises. Day-to-day tasks include building realistic workspaces and files, writing prompts, preparing reference materials and creating grading rubrics that distinguish legally sound work from incomplete or unsupported answers.

What the platform screens for

The screening is likely to verify at least five years of legal practice, a degree from a top-20 university in mainland China and passage of the PRC National Unified Legal Professional Qualification Exam. Native or fluent Mandarin Chinese is required. Expect follow-up questions on the PRC Civil Code and your experience in at least one of company, contract or employment law, along with scenarios testing whether you can translate professional judgment into clear evaluation criteria.

Practical details

The work is remote and listed at about 21 hours per week. The listing describes an hourly pilot running Oct 23 to Nov 19, but does not specify whether scheduling is fully asynchronous or which time zone governs deadlines.

Pay band: $85/hr

What they look for

At least 5 years of legal practice
Native or fluent Mandarin Chinese
Degree from a top-20 university in mainland China
PRC National Unified Legal Professional Qualification Exam
Deep knowledge of the PRC Civil Code
Deep knowledge of company, contract or employment law in mainland China

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This verifies the required practice duration and distinguishes direct legal responsibility from internships, research or administrative support.
A strong answer: Give a concise chronology with dates, organisation types, matter categories and your personal role in drafting, advising, negotiating, reviewing or handling disputes. Use examples that can withstand follow-up without disclosing client-confidential information.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by naming prestigious matters without explaining what they personally did or by leaving date gaps that make the five-year threshold unclear.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

LAW on Sidequest

What law AI work pays

Rates by specialty, the platforms hiring, and every open role in this field.