Intelligence Agency Officer

$50–100/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Generalist

Evaluate intelligence scenarios, analytical content, and operational narratives used to train AI systems. The work is remote and suited to professionals with firsthand civilian intelligence experience across collection, analysis, operations, or national security decision-making.

The work

Day to day, contractors analyze intelligence-style data, evaluate written outputs, create realistic scenarios, detect trends or anomalies, and draft or edit communications modeled on intelligence workflows. Deliverables should be analytically rigorous, concise, security-aware, and based only on information appropriate for an unclassified project environment.

What the screening covers

The screening is likely to examine the substance of your civilian intelligence background, your command of collection and analytical methods, and your ability to explain how you assess evidence under uncertainty. Expect follow-up questions about HUMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, threat analysis, operational planning, intelligence writing, and the standards you would use to identify weak or misleading AI-generated content.

Logistics

This is a remote contractor engagement with asynchronous collaboration and occasional written or verbal coordination. The listing does not state typical weekly hours, project length, or a fixed schedule, so candidates should be ready to describe their realistic availability and response times. Observed compensation is not guaranteed.

Pay band: $50–100/hr

What they look for

intelligence analysis
threat analysis
operational planning
written communication
verbal communication
scenario creation
data interpretation
trend identification
anomaly detection
content evaluation
ai training data creation
collaborative communication
security awareness
information synthesis
humint
sigint
osint
remote work proficiency
attention to detail

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your claimed intelligence background is firsthand, relevant to the project, and specific enough to withstand follow-up without relying on sensitive disclosures.
A strong answer: Give role type, organizational context, approximate tenure, personal responsibilities, and the kinds of products or decisions you supported. Keep examples unclassified and separate your own work from the broader mission of the team.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose credibility by naming a prominent agency but describing only its general mission, or by implying access to sensitive material instead of establishing their own responsibilities.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.