Ground Combat & Special Operations SME

$75–130/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Generalist

Review and develop ground-combat and special-operations cases used to evaluate AI reasoning, uncertainty handling and operational fidelity. The work calls for firsthand tactical judgment, clear documentation and an ability to distinguish legitimate doctrinal analysis from unlawful planning.

The work

This remote contractor role supports an advanced military-activity evaluation project. Day to day, SMEs author and classify realistic cases involving operational decision support, destructive execution and unlawful planning, then assess model responses for source use, uncertainty handling, reasoning quality, limitations and tactical or targeting utility.

What the screening focuses on

micro1 is looking for evidence of firsthand responsibility in ground maneuver, direct action or close-combat planning and execution. Screening is likely to probe whether you can distinguish lawful from unlawful activity, identify unrealistic or cinematic assumptions, recognize when a model over-refuses legitimate doctrinal or readiness questions, and document edge cases with a defensible rationale. Experience with instruction, after-action reviews, joint or combined work, wargaming, red teaming or AI evaluation is relevant, but prior AI experience is not required.

Practical details

The engagement is remote and structured as contractor work. The listing does not specify typical weekly hours, project duration, time-zone coverage or whether all work is asynchronous, so candidates should be ready to state their actual availability and clarify scheduling expectations during screening.

Pay band: $75–130/hr

What they look for

Combat
Special Ops
tactical operations

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your experience involved accountable decisions in real units rather than observation, administrative support or general familiarity with military terminology.
A strong answer: Give unit type, role, level of responsibility, mission categories and the decisions you personally owned, while omitting classified or identifying operational details. Separate firsthand experience from training, advisory work and secondhand exposure.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points when they rely on unit prestige, schools or deployments without specifying what they personally planned, approved, supervised or executed.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.