Combat Arms & Targeting SME

$60–110/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Generalist

Review military-activity scenarios and AI-generated responses using operational expertise in fires, targeting, or weapons employment. The work focuses on boundary classification, source handling, uncertainty, operational utility, and defensible documentation rather than building AI systems.

The work

This remote contractor role supports evaluation and training of defense-focused AI systems. Day to day, subject-matter experts map military-activity scenarios to an approved taxonomy, grade AI-generated responses, identify difficult boundary cases, and document disagreements or gray areas in a transparent answer key. The work requires separating valid conceptual, policy, readiness, and evidence-curation support from operational decision support, destructive execution, autonomous weapons, or unlawful planning.

What micro1 screens for

The screen is likely to test whether you can ground judgments in real experience with joint or service-specific fires, targeting, or weapons employment. Expect follow-up questions about source reliability, conflicting pattern-of-life intelligence, uncertainty, targeting utility, law-of-armed-conflict or rules-of-engagement considerations, and cases where a model either overreaches or refuses a legitimate conceptual question. Advanced tactical training, teaching or evaluative experience, and prior work in AI evaluation, wargaming, or red-teaming are preferred or valued, but prior AI experience is not required.

Logistics

The engagement is remote and structured as contractor work. The listing does not state typical weekly hours, scheduling expectations, or whether all work is asynchronous, so candidates should confirm availability requirements during the process. Sensitive experience should be discussed through sanitized, unclassified examples.

Pay band: $60–110/hr

What they look for

Targeting & fires judgment
Boundary discrimination
Utility assessment

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This verifies the candidate's actual level of responsibility, operational setting, decision authority, and exposure to joint or service-specific targeting processes.
A strong answer: A strong answer names the role, platform or community, scope of responsibility, and types of decisions handled, then gives a sanitized example showing personal contribution. It distinguishes direct decision-making from observing, staffing, or administering the process.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by relying on unit names or job titles without explaining what decisions they personally made or evaluated.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.