Education Practitioner - Learning & Assessment Specialist

$90–130/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Education

Review quizzes, formative assessments, tutoring content, and multimodal learning resources for accuracy, instructional value, and learner engagement. Apply rubrics and outcome measures, then document precise recommendations that can improve AI-driven educational tools.

The work

Day to day, you may evaluate tutoring interactions, quizzes, formative assessments, grading criteria, and visual or multimodal resources. The central task is to determine whether content is academically correct, aligned with its learning objectives, appropriate for diverse learners, and likely to build durable understanding rather than simply reveal an answer.

What micro1 screens for

The screening is likely to focus on specific examples from instructional design, learning science, assessment, education, or edtech work. Be prepared to explain how you have applied rubrics, diagnosed weak assessment items, measured learning outcomes, or revised interactive materials. No prior AI experience is required, but you should be able to make defensible evaluation decisions and express them through precise written and verbal feedback.

Practical details

This is a remote contractor role. The listing does not state typical weekly hours or confirm that all work is asynchronous. It gives strong preference to professionals whose availability aligns with the US Pacific Time zone, which may indicate scheduled collaboration or review windows.

Pay band: $90–130/hr

This is the band presented for the listing, not a guaranteed rate or volume of work.

What they look for

instructional designers
educators

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether you can support your background with a specific learner population, instructional context, evaluation method, and observable result.
A strong answer: Describe the learners, intended outcomes, materials or interactions evaluated, and the evidence used to distinguish understanding from short-term performance. State your own decisions and contributions rather than only describing the wider team.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by naming a course or product without explaining what evidence showed that learning had occurred.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.