Dimensional Metrology Quality Engineer

$50–100/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: STEM and Coding

Review first-article inspection deliverables built from 3D scan data, including scan-to-CAD comparisons, datum structures, profiles and position callouts. Distinguish true part nonconformance from fixturing, alignment and measurement artefacts, then document a defensible FAI sign-off recommendation.

The work

This remote contractor role centers on reviewing and producing first-article inspection deliverables from 3D scan data. Day to day, you may validate scan-to-CAD results, interpret drawings and CAD models, establish datum structures, assess profile and position callouts, apply CMM measurement principles and uncertainty analysis, and investigate whether an apparent deviation comes from the part or the inspection setup.

What the screen is likely to assess

The platform will look for practical metrology judgment rather than prior AI experience. Expect follow-up questions about FAI decisions you have made, the inspection software and scanning systems you have used, how you validate alignment and fixturing, and how you communicate uncertainty or insufficient evidence. Strong responses should use verifiable project details while respecting any confidentiality obligations.

Logistics

The engagement is remote and structured as contract work. The listing does not state typical weekly hours, a required schedule or whether every task can be completed asynchronously, so candidates should be ready to give precise availability and confirm scheduling expectations with micro1. Pay band: $50–100/hr

What they look for

GD&T and first-article inspection
3D scanning and inspection software
CMM measurement and uncertainty analysis
Dimensional Metrology expertise

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether you have owned substantive FAI work and can identify the drawing requirements, measurement evidence and approval boundaries involved.
A strong answer: Give a concrete part or assembly context, the applicable drawing and inspection inputs, your exact role, the issues you found and how the final disposition was reached. Separate work you performed personally from work completed by operators, suppliers or other approvers.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by describing general quality support without showing that they produced, validated or approved the dimensional evidence behind an FAI decision.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.

STEM AND CODING on Sidequest

What stem and coding AI work pays

Rates by specialty, the platforms hiring, and every open role in this field.