What the work actually involves
You will spend most of your time in two modes. The first is generative: drafting sample filings — motions for relief from stay, objections to claims, plan confirmation briefs, § 523 complaints, reaffirmation agreements — that reflect both routine and unusual fact patterns, along with the reasoning a practitioner would apply to reach them. The second is evaluative: reading model-generated answers to bankruptcy questions and marking where they go wrong, why, and what a correct answer would have said. The second mode is harder than it sounds. A model output that cites the right Code section and reaches the wrong conclusion about, say, the absolute priority rule or the means test look-back is more dangerous than an obviously bad answer, and the platform is buying your ability to catch exactly that.
You may also annotate real-world-style documents, write short explanatory content for training datasets, and flag areas where the law is unsettled, circuit-split, or shifting — Subchapter V practice, consumer student-loan discharge standards, and third-party release jurisprudence post-Purdue are the kinds of things projects want mapped.
What the screening looks for
micro1's screen is AI-led and conversational, with follow-up questions generated from your answers. It is testing three things: that your bankruptcy experience is hands-on rather than adjacent (have you actually signed filings, appeared before a judge, negotiated with a trustee), that you can explain a doctrine cleanly under pressure without slipping into vagueness, and that your judgment as a reviewer is calibrated — you can distinguish a wrong answer from an incomplete one from a stylistically clumsy but legally sound one. Expect it to push on specifics: chapter, district, party represented, dollar scale, outcome.
Logistics
- Contractor engagement, US-based only; bar licence must be active.
- Fully remote and largely asynchronous, with occasional live calls or verbal recording tasks.
- Hours are flexible and self-scheduled; most contributors treat it as a 5–15 hour weekly supplement to practice, though project phases can offer more.
- Pay in this category has been observed at $100–180/hr, varying by seniority, project, and task type. Rates are not guaranteed.
- Conflicts and client confidentiality remain your responsibility — use hypothetical or fully de-identified fact patterns.