AI Assistant User – Weekly Feedback Study

$30–35/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Generalist

Use Meta Muse or Instinct across at least three parts of your life, then document and rate the assistant’s proactive messages each week. Participants also submit conversation exports with personal details removed and are expected to continue with the same study group over time.

What the work involves

This study is for everyday users who have already used Meta Muse or Instinct for at least two weeks. Each week, you will continue using the assistant in at least three areas of your life, such as work, health, errands or social activity, and log the proactive messages it sends.

What the platform screens for

The screen is likely to verify your prior app use through specific examples rather than general opinions about AI assistants. Expect to explain how you distinguish proactive messages from direct responses, how you would rate usefulness or relevance, and how you would remove personal details without stripping the conversation of context needed for evaluation.

Practical logistics

This is an ongoing, remote study built around asynchronous weekly submissions from the same group of raters. The listing does not state a typical weekly hour total, so candidates should clarify the expected message volume, export scope and submission deadline before accepting.

Pay band: $30–35/hr

This band is observed from the listing and is not guaranteed.

What they look for

At least two weeks of prior Meta Muse or Instinct use
Consistent use of an AI assistant across multiple parts of daily life
Structured logging and rating of proactive assistant messages
Accurate identification of proactive versus user-initiated interactions
Removal of personal details from conversation exports
Reliable weekly participation in an ongoing study

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This verifies the two-week usage requirement and tests whether your claimed experience is supported by a concrete interaction history.
A strong answer: Give the app name, an approximate start date, a realistic usage frequency and two or three recurring uses. The details should make clear that you are an established everyday user rather than someone who installed the app for this application.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose credibility by saying they have used the app for “a while” without dates, frequency or examples that establish at least two weeks of use.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.