Senior AI Video Trainer (US Based)

$20–40/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Creative

Evaluate AI-generated videos and write evidence-based comparisons across composition, editing, pacing, motion graphics, and storytelling. This remote contractor role is intended for US-based video professionals with strong visual judgment and precise annotation skills.

The work

You will compare AI-generated videos, select the stronger result, and document why it performs better. Daily tasks may include examining composition, continuity, pacing, motion, visual effects, graphics, and narrative clarity, then using annotation tools to identify specific frames, sequences, or defects that support your decision. You may also help refine rubrics and quality standards as recurring issues emerge.

What the screen assesses

The platform is likely to verify your production background through concrete examples from editing, filmmaking, cinematography, VFX, or motion graphics work. Expect follow-up questions about how you distinguish technical defects from intentional creative choices, apply a rubric consistently, and explain close comparison decisions. Experience with AI training, data labeling, rubric design, or video annotation is preferred, as is familiarity with Adobe Premiere Pro, After Effects, or DaVinci Resolve.

Practical details

This is a remote, US-based contractor role. The listing does not specify typical weekly hours, guaranteed work volume, or whether all tasks can be completed asynchronously. Most evaluation work is written and tool-based, but occasional verbal feedback or clarification may be required.

Pay band: $20–40/hr

What they look for

Video Editing
Filmmaking
Video Annotation
AI Training
Motion Graphics

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your claimed expertise is grounded in a verifiable project with a defined role, production context, and specific creative decisions.
A strong answer: Describe the project, your exact responsibility, the tools used, and a decision you made about editing, cinematography, VFX, or narrative structure. Explain the observable effect of that decision rather than relying on a portfolio title alone.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by describing the finished piece as a team achievement without separating their own decisions from those made by directors, clients, or other editors.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.