What the work involves
You work from scenario prompts built on public or synthetic case material and produce real litigation work product: a motion to dismiss, a summary judgment brief, a demand letter, interrogatories and requests for production, a meet-and-confer letter. The project is structured as multi-turn engagements, so after you file, a simulated opposing counsel responds and you have to answer that move while keeping one coherent case theory intact across turns. Facts shift, senior direction arrives between turns, and your job is to absorb both without your posture collapsing into contradiction.
The second half of the job is the part most attorneys have never done: for each draft you write rubric items specifying what separates a strong response from a mediocre one. That might mean naming the controlling standard the brief must identify, the element of breach it must plead with particularity, or the damages theory it must not concede. These rubrics are what let the model be scored, and they are read as closely as the drafting itself. You are also expected to flag procedural gaps, missing facts, and ambiguities rather than inventing around them.
What the screen looks for
- Verifiable litigation history: jurisdiction, years post-JD, the kinds of commercial contract matters you actually handled and what you personally drafted
- Command of breach, performance, interpretation, and damages doctrine under follow-up questioning, not just familiarity with the vocabulary
- Whether you can articulate why one brief is stronger than another in specific, checkable terms
- Written register: the screen is reading your prose as a sample of litigation drafting
Logistics
Contractor engagement, remote and US-based, asynchronous within turn deadlines. Pay band: $100/hr. micro1 typically fills these roles within 48 hours and expects first tasks within 24 to 48 hours of onboarding, so apply when you have genuine near-term capacity. No prior AI experience is required.