Human Intelligence Collector (HUMINT)

$30–80/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Worldwide
Field: Other

Apply professional interviewing, elicitation and investigative questioning expertise to the assessment and training of AI systems. The work centers on interpreting responses, documenting defensible reasoning and scoring sessions consistently.

The work

You will conduct or assess structured elicitation and interview sessions, adapt questions in response to verbal and behavioral cues, and evaluate the consistency, reliability and possible evasiveness of answers. Day-to-day tasks may include annotating emotional or motivational drivers, assigning confidence assessments and documenting why a particular interpretation is supported by the interaction.

What micro1 screens for

The screening is likely to emphasize specific experience in HUMINT, law-enforcement interviewing, skilled negotiation or other complex interviewing settings. Expect follow-up on recognized methods such as the PEACE model or cognitive interviewing, how you distinguish observation from inference, and how you justify judgments about tone, pacing, hesitation or gestures. Strong written English is preferred, particularly writing that is clear, precise and defensible. Prior AI experience is not required, although data annotation, model evaluation or after-action report writing is preferred.

Practical details

This is a remote contractor role with a commitment of at least approximately 15 hours per week, and US-based candidates are preferred. The listing does not state that all work is asynchronous, so interview or assessment sessions may require coordination with project schedules. The listed compensation is observed, not guaranteed.

Pay band: $30–80/hr

What they look for

Elicitation strategy
Real-time cue reading
Reliability assessment
Interrogation/investigative questioning
Attention to detail
HUMINT

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your experience involved personally planning, conducting or assessing consequential interviews rather than observing them or relying on general people skills.
A strong answer: Give a concise chronology with role, setting, subject population and personal responsibilities, then describe one representative engagement and its documented outcome. Separate direct interviewing experience from supervision, training or report review.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by naming sensitive roles without providing any verifiable scope, methodology or personal contribution, even at an appropriately unclassified level.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.