Graphic Designer

$35–105/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: Location not stated
Field: Creative

Create and evaluate visual assets that help train AI systems, following project guidelines and brand standards. The work includes digital illustration, layout, design critique, rationale documentation, and iterative revision in a remote contractor setting.

The work

You will produce digital illustrations, layouts, and other graphic assets for an AI training project. Day-to-day tasks may include following brand standards, critiquing existing materials, documenting design decisions, organizing source files, and revising work through feedback cycles.

What the platform screens for

micro1 is looking for evidence of advanced proficiency with Adobe Creative Suite, Figma, or equivalent tools, supported by a portfolio of digital, print, and/or branding work. Screening may also examine how you apply visual hierarchy, storytelling, current design practices, and user-centered principles when requirements are incomplete or competing.

Evaluation and collaboration

The role requires more than producing polished visuals. You should be able to identify specific weaknesses in a design, recommend actionable changes, explain the rationale behind those changes, and communicate clearly with project stakeholders in writing and conversation. Familiarity with AI, machine learning, or data-driven design workflows is preferred, but not required.

Practical details

This is a remote contractor role. Production and documentation are likely to be handled largely asynchronously, with written and verbal collaboration required during reviews and handoffs. The listing does not specify typical weekly hours or a fixed schedule, so candidates should confirm workload and availability expectations during onboarding.

Pay band: $35–105/hr

What they look for

graphic design

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether you can distinguish your own decisions and outputs from team contributions using verifiable project details.
A strong answer: Choose one relevant digital, print, or branding project and state the brief, constraints, tools, your exact responsibilities, major design decisions, revision process, and final deliverables. Include a concrete result or stakeholder outcome if one is available.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by describing the finished visuals without clarifying what they personally created or why key choices were made.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.