What the work actually involves

You'll be working from prompts and supplied source documentation to build the kind of paper a staff section turns out on a normal week: Weekly Activity Reports, MARs, SITREPs, after-action summaries, decision memos, and one-page executive briefings. Some tasks ask you to write the golden reference — the version a model should be trying to match. Others give you a model-generated or contributor-submitted draft and ask you to grade it against a rubric for clarity, factual accuracy, format compliance, and whether it reads like something a chief of staff would actually pass upward rather than send back.

A second stream of work is upstream of the writing: contributing realistic input artifacts (raw activity logs, email threads, fragmentary unit inputs) so that tasks aren't artificially clean, and helping shape the rubrics themselves. If you can explain why a SITREP buries the assessment in the wrong paragraph, or why an exec summary that leads with process instead of the decision required is a failure, that articulation is a large part of the value here.

What the screen is looking for

micro1's screening is AI-led and follows up on whatever you claim. It's checking that you've genuinely sat in a reporting billet — that you can name the format, the audience, the review chain, and the specific conventions your organization enforced — and that you can grade someone else's writing consistently rather than just rewrite it in your own voice. Expect probes on federal style guidance, classification and handling discipline, and how you'd separate a stylistic preference from an actual compliance defect. Nothing classified should ever enter your answers or your deliverables; the ability to describe your work at an unclassified level is itself part of the assessment.

Logistics

  • Remote, contractor, US-based only
  • Asynchronous and task-based; most contributors set their own hours around a weekly throughput expectation
  • Part-time is normal — many contributors work 10–20 hours a week alongside other commitments
  • Feedback cycles are iterative: rubrics and client standards change, and rework on earlier batches is part of the job
  • Pay band of $40–80/hr reflects observed rates for this role type and is not a guarantee