Digital Designer

$21–35/hr

rate as listed

Workload: ~15h/week
Engagement: Project-based
Location: US
Field: Creative

Evaluate original digital artwork or photography against AI-generated images, documenting visible differences in anatomy, color, lighting, perspective, texture and detail. This remote US contractor role combines image creation, close visual analysis and concise technical critique.

The work

You will upload original digital images or photographs that meet project specifications, then compare them side by side with AI-generated counterparts. Reviews call for specific observations about anatomy, color, lighting, perspective, texture, shadows, reflections, text and fine detail, with each issue tied to a clear location in the image.

What micro1 screens for

The screen is likely to focus on portfolio-backed experience in digital art, retouching, compositing, 3D rendering, graphic design, color grading or photography. Expect follow-up questions that test whether you can distinguish genuine image defects from stylistic variation, recognize common generative-image artifacts and write concise feedback using accurate visual terminology. Experience with Photoshop, Lightroom, Procreate, Blender or similar tools is preferred, while prior AI work is not required.

Working format

This is a remote contractor engagement limited to people located in the United States. The work prioritizes accuracy and methodical review over speed, and contributors may coordinate with project staff to align evaluation standards. The listing does not specify whether every assignment is asynchronous or provide typical weekly hours, so candidates should confirm scheduling and workload expectations during onboarding.

Pay band: $21–35/hr

What they look for

image evaluation
Comparative ranking
attention to visual detail
written communication
verbal comunication
digital photography
Artifact detection
constructive feedback
collaboration

Included with this listing

Interview prep — 10 questions

Matched to what this platform's screening actually measures. Answer each out loud in 60–90 seconds: claim → concrete example → implication.

What it tests: This tests whether your claimed experience is supported by a specific original work and whether you can explain the visual and technical decisions behind it under follow-up.
A strong answer: Name the discipline, tools, project constraints and your direct contribution, then point to a portfolio example whose authorship and production process you can verify. Explain why that work required close control of elements such as lighting, composition, texture or color.
Where people lose it: Candidates lose points by listing software or creative fields without connecting them to a verifiable project they personally produced.

Summary, eligibility guidance and screening preparation are prepared by Sidequest from the platform's posting. Check the source listing before applying.