What the work involves

You will spend most of your time reading model-generated responses to scenarios involving child and adolescent abuse — disclosure moments, mandated-reporting dilemmas, questions from a caregiver who may themselves be implicated, a teenager asking whether what happened to them "counts." Your job is to say, with clinical precision, where the model's answer is wrong, where it is technically correct but retraumatizing in tone, and where it quietly skips a safeguarding step. You'll also write: case vignettes that reflect real complexity rather than textbook presentation, short best-practice documents on trauma-informed responding, and written rationales that a non-clinician reviewer can act on.

Expect iterative cycles. A batch you critique gets revised and comes back; consistency between your first and second pass matters, and disagreements with other reviewers get adjudicated. Cross-disciplinary calls with safety, policy, and engineering staff happen occasionally — you'll be asked to translate clinical reasoning into rules a system can be trained on, which is harder than it sounds.

What the screen looks for

  • Credential verification. Completed MD, PhD in psychology, or PhD in social work — not in progress.
  • Caseload composition. The listing is explicit: this is for clinicians whose primary or exclusive focus is youth abuse survivors, and who are still actively practising. Expect direct questions about what percentage of your current work this represents.
  • Framework fluency under follow-up. Naming TF-CBT or the ACEs literature is the easy part; the screen probes what you do when the standard protocol doesn't fit the case.
  • Evaluation judgment. Can you separate "clinically incorrect" from "clinically correct but unsafe for an unsupervised user"? That distinction is most of the job.
  • Ethics and privacy discipline. How you handle case material without identifying anyone.

Logistics

Remote, contractor, asynchronous for most tasks. Reviewers typically commit a stated number of hours per week rather than fixed shifts, with occasional scheduled calls. Rates in the $100–200/hr band have been observed on this project and vary by credential and specialization; nothing is guaranteed. This is emotionally heavy material reviewed in volume — a realistic answer about your own sustainable weekly capacity is worth more here than an ambitious one.